Dear Brett,
I understand this new policy is for documenting the disqualification of a user from a tool, that was done before occasionally.
I would suggest to include the SNF Faculty Director and the offending user's supervisor in the communication during the investigation. I think they should know how the user violated the rule and how the disqualification is decided, before they get the email notification of the final decision.
In addition, there should be a formal appeal process that can handle any conflict or disagreement.
I would suggest to include the SNF Faculty Director and the offending user's supervisor in the communication during the investigation. I think they should know how the user violated the rule and how the disqualification is decided, before they get the email notification of the final decision.
In addition, there should be a formal appeal process that can handle any conflict or disagreement.
Regards,
Kwan-Kyu
__________________________
Kwan-Kyu Park, Ph. D.
Research Associate
E. L. Ginzton Laboratory,
Research Associate
E. L. Ginzton Laboratory,
Center for Nanoscale Science and Engineering
345 Via PeubloStanford University
Stanford, CA 94305
Tel: 650-353-1376
Stanford, CA 94305
Tel: 650-353-1376
email: kwankyup@stanford.edu
On Sep 10, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Brett Huff wrote:
<Tool Discipline Disqual Policy.docx>Labmembers,The attached policy is being provided for your review. It is open to SNF User feedback for the next two weeks. At that time any accepted modifications will be incorporated and the document will be added to the SNF WIKI for future education and disciplinary reference.
No comments:
Post a Comment